Are Vaccination Rates Higher If Providers
Receive Free Vaccines and Follow Contraindication Guidelines?
Richard K. Zimmerman, MD, MPH; Tammy
A. Mieczkowski, PhD; Matthew Michel
Background and Objectives: Economics
has been suggested as a barrier to vaccination, but
data that link clinician reports to actual immunization
rates are limited. This study examined the relationship
between clinicians’ self-report regarding likelihood
of vaccinating and actual age at vaccination from a
registry of children seen by the clinicians.
Methods: Standardized telephone
survey results of 29 providers were compared to the
immunization records of children seeing these providers,
using analysis of contingency tables (on time versus
late) and conditional hierarchical linear models with
log age at diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP)#3, DTP#4,
and measles-mumps-rubella (MMR)#1 as the dependent variables.
Results: Children seeing providers
likely to refer an uninsured child for immunization
were vaccinated at a later log age at DTP#4 but not
for DTP#3 or MMR#1 than children seeing providers unlikely
to refer. Vaccination rates were higher for MMR#1 (77%
versus 48%), DTP#3 (84% versus 71%), and DTP#4 (82%
versus 66%) among providers who received free vaccine,
compared with children seen by providers who did not
receive free vaccine. These results remained significant
in the hierarchical analyses. Providers likely to vaccinate
an 18-month-old with watery diarrhea had higher vaccination
rates than those unlikely to vaccinate for MMR#1, DTP#3,
and DTP#4; the results were also significant in the
hierarchical analyses.
Conclusions: Children
are vaccinated later in the practices of providers who
are likely to refer uninsured children to a public vaccine
clinic for vaccination, who do not receive free vaccine
supplies, or who overinterpret contraindications.
Special Series: Award-winning
Research Papers From the American Academy of Family
Physicians 1998 Scientific Assembly
(Fam Med 1999;31(5):317-23.)
Does
Telephone Contact With a Physician’s Office Staff Improve
Mammogram Screening Rates?
Kim Marvel, PhD; Gregory Major, MD
Background and Objectives: Mammography
is an important screening tool for the early detection
of breast cancer. However, mammogram screening rates
are low, despite interventions to improve them. We investigated
two methods to improve mammogram screening and compared
mammogram rates among women who received these interventions
to mammogram screening rates in a control group. We
also investigated the costs involved in these interventions.
Methods: We studied mammogram screening rates
of three randomized groups of women ages 50 and older
from the Deighton Family Practice Center in Southfield,
Mich. All women had had a mammogram 1 year previously
and were due for another mammogram. Our control group
(n=110) received no intervention. The second group of
women (n=102) received a reminder letter from the radiology
department. The third group (n=86) received a reminder
letter followed by a phone call from the physician’s
office staff if no mammogram had been obtained within
8 weeks after the due date for the mammogram. All three
groups were monitored for 14 weeks after the due date
to determine mammogram screening rates in each group.
Results: A mammogram was obtained by 33% of women
in group 1, 37% of women in group 2, and 57% of women
in group 3. The mammogram screening rate of the third
group was significantly greater than in the first two
groups. In the third group, the additional cost added
by the phone call intervention was $9 per mammogram
obtained.
Conclusions: Mammogram screening
rates are increased when patients are contacted by both
a reminder letter and a phone call.
Special Series: Award-winning
Research Papers From the American Academy of Family
Physicians 1998 Scientific Assembly
(Fam Med 1999;31(5):324-6.)
Shorter
Dosing Interval of Opiate Solution Shortens Hospital
Stay for Methadone Babies
Heidi Chumley Jones, MD
Background and Objectives:
Methadone maintenance is the standard of care for pregnant
opiate addicts. However, withdrawal of an infant from
methadone after birth often results in a lengthy hospital
stay. This study identified potentially modifiable factors
that are associated with the length of hospital stay
of infants of mothers on methadone.
Methods: This study used a retrospective case
series of patients from a university hospital in Texas.
Eligible participants included 41 neonates born between
January 1991 and December 1996 to mothers taking methadone
at time of delivery. Charts were reviewed for factors
relating to administration of opiates to the newborn,
and the length of the hospital stay was recorded for
each infant. Bivariate and multiple regression analyses
were performed using length of hospital stay as the
outcome measure.
Results: Higher peak dose of tincture of opiate
solution (TOS) and longer dosing interval were found
to be related to longer length of hospital stay. These
variables explained 23% of the variation in length of
stay.
Conclusions: Lower peak doses of TOS and shorter
dosing intervals may be associated with shorter hospital
stays for infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome
secondary to maternal methadone treatment.Lower peak
doses of TOS and shorter dosing intervals may be associated
with shorter hospital stays for infants with neonatal
abstinence syndrome secondary to maternal methadone
treatment.
Special Series: Award-winning
Research Papers From the American Academy of Family
Physicians 1998 Scientific Assembly
(Fam Med 1999;31(5):327-30.)
Using
a Flow Sheet to Improve Performance in Treatment of
Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Gary Ruoff, MD; Lynn S. Gray, MD, MPH
Background and Objectives:
Numerous studies have shown that physicians do not provide
all the preventive and therapeutic care recommended
for patients with diabetes. This study determined if
use of a medical record flow sheet could increase compliance
with seven quality-of-care indicators developed by the
American Diabetes Association.
Methods: Subjects included Medicare enrollees
with type 2 diabetes. Following an analysis of baseline
data, physicians in the practice used a flow sheet that
contained recommended guidelines for diabetes care.
Staff inserted the flow sheet into the records of patients
included in the baseline sample. Physicians and staff
also received education about use of the flow sheet.
The post-intervention sample consisted of the same subjects,
if they had been seen by the practice during a 3-month
period.
Results: The records of 114 subjects were reviewed
at baseline. Of these subjects, 109 received care during
the study period. Improvement was shown in six of the
seven quality indicators and was also observed in the
performance of post-intervention rates for patients
whose flow sheet was used, compared with those for whom
it was not used.
Conclusions: The results indicate
that education and performance in diabetes care can
improve with the use of a flow sheet.
Special Series: Award-winning
Research Papers From the American Academy of Family
Physicians 1998 Scientific Assembly
(Fam Med 1999;31(4):257-62.)
The Efficacy and Safety
of Budesonide Inhalation Suspension: A Nebulizable Corticosteroid
for Persistent Asthma in Infants and Young Children
Martha V. White, MD; Mario Cruz-Rivera,
PhD; Karen Walton-Bowen, MSc, CStat
Background and Objectives:
This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of four
dosing regimens of budesonide inhalation suspension
in children ages 6 months to 8 years with moderate persistent
asthma.
Methods: This 12-week, randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled, parallel-group study involved 481
children at 38 centers throughout the United States.
Active treatment groups were budesonide inhalation suspension
.25 mg once daily (QD), .25-mg two times daily (BID),
.5-mg BID, or 1-mg QD. Efficacy was assessed by recording
nighttime and daytime asthma symptoms, use of rescue
medication, and discontinuation from the study because
of worsening asthma and/or a requirement for systemic
steroids. Objective measures of pulmonary function were
assessed in children who were capable of consistently
performing pulmonary function tests; peak expiratory
flow (PEF) measurements were recorded twice daily on
diary cards, and spirometry was recorded at clinic visits.
Results: Baseline patient demographics, nighttime
and daytime symptom scores, and pulmonary function data
were similar across placebo and budesonide treatment
groups. The majority of patients were male (64%) with
a mean age of 55.0 ± 26.3 months. The mean duration
of asthma was 34.2 ± 22.9 months, and mean baseline
forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was 79.8%
of predicted, with 29.1% reversibility. Significant
improvements in nighttime and daytime asthma symptoms
scores were observed in budesonide treatment groups,
compared with placebo. The mean change from baseline
to week 0–12 for nighttime and daytime asthma symptom
scores was significantly greater for the .25-mg BID,
.5-mg BID, and 1-mg QD budesonide treatment groups,
compared with placebo; significant clinical improvement
was observed by the second week of treatment. The lowest
budesonide dose used (.25 mg QD) resulted in numerical
improvements in symptom scores that were not statistically
significant when compared to placebo. Significant improvements
in morning PEF were observed in all budesonide treatment
groups, except for the .25-mg QD group, compared with
placebo. All treatment groups showed numerical improvement
in FEV1, but only the .5-mg BID dose was significantly
different from placebo.
Conclusions: The results of this
study demonstrate that budesonide inhalation suspension
is effective and well tolerated for infants and young
children with moderate persistent asthma. Budesonide
inhalation suspension is an important therapeutic option
for young children who are not able to use other available
delivery devices.
Special Series: Award-winning
Research Papers From the American Academy of Family
Physicians 1998 Scientific Assembly
(Fam Med 1999;31(5):337-45.)
Precept-Assist®:
A Computerized, Data-based Evaluation System
Robert A. DiTomasso, PhD; James D.
Gamble, MD; Mary A. Willard, MD
Background and Objectives: Traditional
methods of resident evaluation have several limitations,
including recall bias and memory decay. We developed
a real-time, computerized, data-based evaluation system
and determined 1) the feasibility of using such a system
in an ambulatory care teaching center and 2) the types
of evaluation data such a computer-based evaluation
system provides to residency directors, faculty, and
residents.
Methods: We developed Precept-Assist®, a computerized,
data-based evaluation system. Reports from the system
provide quantitative data, summative reports, and qualitative
comments regarding specific competencies of residents.
Following each precepting encounter between a faculty
member and a resident, the faculty member entered into
the system an array of coded information on the resident’s
level of performance, competencies achieved, and procedural
skills.
Results: We have entered more than 15,000 pieces
of evaluative data on 4,504 precepting encounters. The
average time to enter data was about 40 seconds per
encounter. Reports were generated to monitor each resident’s
progress through the program. The information was used
to generate learning plans tailored to each resident’s
needs.
Conclusions: Precept-Assist was
useful for evaluating the performance of residents in
this study.
Residency Education
(Fam Med 1999;31(5):346-52.)
Review
of University of British Columbia Family Practice Resident
Research Projects 1990–1997
Stefan Grzybowski, MD, MClSc; Harvey
V. Thommasen, MD, MSc; Jocelyn Mills; Carol P. Herbert,
MD
Background: Resident research projects
can be an important component of building a strong and
diversified research presence in family medicine. One
of the requirements for graduation from the University
of British Columbia (UBC) Family Practice Residency
Program is that family practice residents complete a
scholarly piece of work.
Methods: UBC family practice resident projects
from 1990–1997 were reviewed and classified by methodology.
A survey was sent to 251 former residents to determine
1) if their project was published, 2) if not, was there
any interest in publication, and 3) what were the main
reasons for not pursuing publication. Fifteen projects
were selected as suitable for publication and were,
with permission of the resident, submitted to medical
journals.
Results: Sixty-nine percent of the resident projects
involved data collection and hypothesis testing, and
40% were cross-sectional, of which patient surveys were
the most common method. A total of 190 former residents
(71%) have responded to our survey. Seven percent of
respondents stated that their project had been published,
and 55% would have liked to have tried to publish their
project. Of the 15 resident projects we submitted for
publication, seven were accepted.
Conclusions: Family practice residents
are capable of producing a wide variety of research
projects. Only a minority of projects are being published
despite the fact that the majority of residents are
interested in pursuing publication. Greater assistance
by faculty can increase publication of research projects.
Residency Education
(Fam Med 1999;31(5):337-45.)
Diabetes
Education Program Use and Patient-perceived Barriers
to Attendance
Corina Graziani, MD; Michael P. Rosenthal,
MD; James J. Diamond, PhD
Background and Objectives: Although
self-management education is an essential component
of optimal diabetes care, diabetes education programs
are greatly underused. This study examined the use of
diabetes education programs by a university-based family
practice patient population in Philadelphia. Predictors
of program attendance, as well as patient-perceived
barriers to attendance, were identified.
Methods: A survey designed to collect information
on demographics, clinical factors associated with diabetes,
experience with diabetes education, and reasons for
nonattendance at education programs was administered
to 150 patients with diabetes.
Results: wenty-two percent of the subjects had
attended a diabetes education program. Female gender,
insulin use, and higher degree of obesity were positively
associated with education program attendance. Physician
recommendation was an important predictor of attendance.
Significant barriers to attendance included lack of
awareness of programs, misperceptions about what programs
involved, structural barriers, and health beliefs.
Conclusions: Diabetes education
programs are underused. Physicians can improve program
attendance and outcomes for people with diabetes by
implementing interventions designed to address the identified
barriers.
Clinical Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1999;31(5):358-63.)
|