January 1999, Vol. 31, No. 1
 
Clinical and Cultural Issues in Caring for Deaf People
Steven Barnett, MD

Background and Objectives: The clinical practice of family medicine is increasingly cross-cultural. Promoting culturally sensitive and competent health care is one of the goals of medical educators in guiding medical students and residents, as well as designing continuing education for family physicians. Working with minority communities is essential to meet that goal. The Deaf community is a linguistic and cultural minority group that is often overlooked. Working with the Deaf community to help develop cultural competency and sensitivity has potential benefits. This article introduces some of the sociocultural experiences of deafness and their relevance in health care settings.

Special Series
(Fam Med 1999;31(1):17-22.)

 

Retention of Family Medicine Faculty Development Fellows in Academic Medicine
Francis P. Kohrs, MD, MSPH; Arch G. Mainous III, PhD

Objective: This study measured the retention of family medicine faculty development fellows in academic medicine.

Methods: Surveys were sent, in two stages, to 1) fellowship program directors and 2) fellows. These surveys were about full-time faculty development fellowships with new or continued Title VII funding during the interval of 1993–1996. Retention as faculty was the primary outcome. Likelihood of leaving academics and service in a federally designated medically underserved area were secondary outcomes.

Results: The fellowship program directors survey produced an 88% response rate and identified 105 alumni. The survey of fellows yielded a response rate of 73% (n=77). The retention rate of these newly graduated family medicine fellows in academic positions was 75% (n=58). A total of 37% (n=21) of alumni in full- and part-time teaching positions reported being likely to leave their current position within the next 2 years.

Conclusions: Retention rates of newly graduated family medicine fellows in academic positions are similar to rates reported in the 1980s. This group anticipates a high job turnover within the next 2 years.

Educational Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1999;30(1):23-7.)


Variability in the Learning Experiences of Family Practice Residents During an Obstetrics Rotation
Alicia M. Weissman, MD; Jeffrey D. Dawson, ScD; Dianna L. Fox

Background and Objectives
: Residency rotations do not necessarily provide the same clinical experience to each resident. This study quantified and explained the variability in participation in deliveries by family practice residents during an obstetrics rotation at a community hospital.

Methods: We collected prospectively completed resident experience logs from 17 residents and information from the hospital Summary of Delivery forms for 1,166 deliveries. The data were analyzed using methods to account for within-supervisor correlation.

Results: Participation and delivery rates varied markedly. In stepwise conditional regression analysis, resident participation in deliveries was positively associated with prior resident involvement during the labor and negatively associated with occurrence of the delivery on the night shift and with male gender of the resident. Resident performance of delivery was positively associated with non-instrumented vaginal delivery, prior resident involvement during the labor, and patient multiparity and negatively associated with male resident gender.

Conclusions: We found substantial variability in resident experience and identified several factors associated with increased resident experience. Variability of experience among residents in clinical rotations should be assessed to ensure that all residents receive adequate training.

Educational Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1999;31(1):28-33.)



The Role of the Chair’s Spouse in Academic Departments of Family Medicine
Anita D. Taylor, MAEd

Background and Objectives: Family medicine has the highest percentage of unfilled budgeted faculty positions of all clinical and basic science departments. To successfully recruit and retain academic leaders, personal and professional issues need to be recognized and valued. This study reports the results of a national survey of chairs and an important, often overlooked factor in recruitment and retention—the spouse of the department chair.

Methods: Questionnaires were sent to 107 chairs of academic departments or divisions of family medicine and their spouses.

Results: There was a usable response rate of 86%, and data from 85 questionnaires (79%) were analyzed. The spouses’ highest role priority was family, perhaps reflecting their relatively young mean age of 48.6 years. There was a statistically significant correlation between those who were “oriented” to the role of chair’s spouse and a higher level of participation in departmental activities. Data are also reported on spouse role satisfaction, expectations, and factors in deciding to stay or leave their current location.

Conclusions: The results suggest that with the increased competition for family physicians in a multitude of practice settings, search committees for family medicine department chairs need to be innovative and attentive to personal as well as professional factors in recruiting and retaining future and current department chairs. It would be prudent to acknowledge the role of the spouse in decisions concerning job selection and satisfaction.

Educational Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1998;31(1):34-8.)

  
{Text}