Retention of Neonatal Resuscitation Skills and
Knowledge: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Janusz Kaczorowski, PhD; Cheryl Levitt MBBCh;
Merryl Hammond, PhD; Eugene Outerbridge, MD; Roland Grad, MDCM;
Ann Rothman, MDCM; Lisa Graves, MD
Background and Objectives: This study
compared the effectiveness of two booster strategies designed
to improve retention of skills and knowledge in neonatal resuscitation
by family practice residents.
Methods: Residents were randomly
allocated to one of three groups: video, hands on, or control.
Residents in the two experimental groups received a “booster”
3–5 months after the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP)
course. All participants completed the follow-up test 6–8
months after taking the course. The main outcome measures
consisted of the NRP written examination and the performance
checklists.
Results: A total of 44 residents
completed the study (video, n=13; hands- on, n=14; control,
n=17). Overall, participants had significantly lower scores
at follow-up than at baseline, indicating deterioration in
both neonatal skills and knowledge. Residents in the hands-on
booster group made significantly fewer errors across all five
checklists in life-supporting but not in lifesaving scores
than those allocated to the control and video groups.
Conclusions: The beneficial effect of
mannequin practice or video boosters on skills and knowledge
retention was less than what had been anticipated, and no
benefit could be demonstrated in comparison to the control
group. Deteriorating knowledge and skills remain a major concern,
since boostering by hands-on or video at 3–5 months do not
seem to have an impact on the retention of knowledge or lifesaving
skills.
Educational Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1998;30(10):705-11.)
Enhancing
the Family Medicine Curriculum in Deliveries and Emergency
Medicine as a Way of Developing a Rural Teaching Site
Wm. MacMillan Rodney, MD; Loren A. Crown,
MD; Ricardo Hahn, MD; John Martin, MD
Background: The urban family practice
residencies of Memphis were not providing sufficient training
or encouragement to young physicians for practice in rural
communities.
Methods: In 1990, the Department
of Family Medicine, in partnership with the State of Tennessee
Health Access Act and the Baptist Health Care System, developed
a teaching practice in a rural county of western Tennessee.
The family practice curriculum included special skills in
advanced women’s health care and emergency medicine so that
uniformly trained physicians could provide around-the-clock
coverage in the hospital, including the delivery of babies
and first-hour emergency care.
Results: After 7 years, the group
now includes six full-time, board-certified, OB-capable family
physicians. In addition, faculty members from the department’s
urban program in Memphis are required to contribute a “mini
locum tenens” of 2–3 days of rural coverage per month. Since
1992, the practice has provided care for more than 54,000
continuity office visits, 81,000 emergency department visits,
more than 3,500 hospital admissions, and 621 obstetrical deliveries.
Since 1994, residents have been assigned to the site full
time, with growth to 12 (4-4-4) residents assigned to this
location as of 1997. Several graduates from the initial group
of residents have remained in the community after graduation,
and three others have established practices in rural areas.
Most recently, control of the practice is being transferred
from the family medicine department to the university’s corporate
group practice. This may result in fundamental changes in
the practice’s operation.
Conclusions: The approach described in
this report may be useful for the expansion of urban departments
of family medicine into rural and underserved communities.
Educational Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1998;30(9):712-9.)
Implementing
Problem-based Learning in a Family Medicine Clerkship
Evelyn T. Washington, MD; James W. Tysinger,
PhD; Laura M. Snell, MPH; Lawrence R. Palmer, MD, MPH
Background and Objectives: Problem-based
learning (PBL) has been implemented in the curriculum of many
medical schools, but limited information is available about
the outcome of this learning technique. The educational intervention
presented in this paper implemented a PBL learning component
in our third-year family medicine clerkship and measured the
outcomes of this curricular change.
Methods: One third of the curricular
time devoted to didactic teaching in our family medicine clerkship
was replaced with PBL activities. Simulated cases were developed
and presented to students who, with the aid of faculty facilitators,
studied the cases, gathered information about the cases, and
developed diagnostic and management plans for the cases. The
outcome of the intervention was measured by a) comparing students’
scores on the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) family
medicine clerkship examination to scores achieved by students
in the year before PBL was introduced and b) students’ evaluations
of the relevance and success of PBL in the clerkship curriculum.
Results: Students’
NBME clerkship examination scores increased from a mean of
66 the year before PBL began to 73 after PBL was implemented.
More than 80% of students reported that PBL was a good way
to learn family medicine, and 85% reported that the PBL technique
provided sufficient information to formulate learning issues.
Conclusions: PBL can be introduced into
a third-year family medicine clerkship curriculum with general
acceptance by students. Students rated the technique highly,
and their examination scores improved.
Educational Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1998;30(10):720-6.)
Do
We Practice What We Teach About Childhood Immunization in
New Jersey?
Catherine M. Sharkness, MD, MS; Barbara D.
Goun, PhD; Lloyd A. Davis, MD; Lakeisha E. Sykes
Background and Objectives: Although childhood
immunization is a benchmark for preventive service delivery
in family practices, no data have been reported on childhood
immunization in New Jersey family practice residencies. This
study assesses immunization coverage among 2-year-olds in
nine residencies and evaluates childhood immunization knowledge
and barriers in 10 residency programs.
Methods: We performed a retrospective
review of immunization records of 2-year-olds, using the Centers
for Disease Control’s Clinic Assessment Software Application,
and analyzed a survey of knowledge and barriers to immunization
completed by residents, nurses, and faculty.
Results: Among
726 children with four or more office visits, the mean percent
of children immunized with the combination of four diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis,
three polio, and one measles-mumps-rubella was 53% (range
31%–69%). The age-appropriate immunization rate was highest
at 3 months (78%) and lowest at 16 months (29%). Among the
294 survey respondents, the mean knowledge score was 75% overall
and 82% for faculty, 77% for nurses, and 71% for residents.
There was moderate to good correlation of audit levels with
knowledge, with 49% of the variation in immunization coverage
explained by variation in knowledge. Lack of immunization
records was reported by 47% as the most important office-related
barrier.
Conclusions: Immunization rates of 2-year-olds
in nine New Jersey family practice residencies are below Healthy
People 2000 goals. Low immunization rates in residency programs
may improve with increased knowledge, an area for future study.
Research into removing immunization-related barriers is also
needed.
Educational Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1998;30(10):727-32.)
Prescription
Medication Use in Older Americans: A National Report Card
on Prescribing
Saif S. Rathore; Shilpa S. Mehta, PharmD;
William L. Boyko, Jr, PharmD; Kevin A. Schulman, MD
Background and Objectives: Due to their
high prevalence of disease, older Americans receive more prescription
medication than any other age group. We evaluated prescription
medication use in patients age 50 or older; categorized and
reported medication use by age group, drug class, and therapeutic
class; and examined differences in prescribing patterns for
older patients.
Methods: All prescription medications
reported in the 1995 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey,
a nationally representative sample of ambulatory care visits
in the United States for patients age 50 and older (n=16,289),
were evaluated in a cross-sectional analysis. We evaluated
the number of prescription medications reported for each patient
visit and ranked use of drug and therapeutic classes.
Results: Most
patients seeing physicians (61%) had a prescription for at
least one medication, ranging from a mean of 1.27 medications
in patients ages 50–64 to 1.58 in patients over 85. Calcium
channel blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
were prescribed more than beta blockers in all patients. Data
also indicated a significant decrease in estrogen/progestin
and antidepressant medication use in older patients.
Conclusions: Our findings indicate prescribing
patterns inconsistent with national guidelines and decreased
medication use, suggesting underprescription. Active intervention
may be needed to improve the pharmacological treatment of
older patients.
Clinical Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1998;30(10):733-9.)
|