Unique Learning Contributions of a Family Medicine
Preceptorship
Craig L. Gjerde, PhD; Barcey T. Levy, PhD,
MD; George C. Xakellis, Jr, MD, MBA
Background: There is a belief among family
medicine educators that a third-year family medicine rotation
provides unique clinical learning experiences, but there is
limited research to support this belief. This study identified
clinical skills performed by third-year medical students only
during a community-based family medicine preceptorship, even
when the family medicine rotation occurs after all other required
clerkships
Methods: During 6 academic years (1990–1996), 87 third-year
students completed the family medicine preceptorship as their
final rotation and rated their experience with 80 clinical
activities (preventive health care, clinical problem management,
and procedures) after completing all required clerkships other
than family medicine and again after the family medicine preceptorship.
Ratings measured whether the activities occurred on the family
medicine rotation, only on other rotations, or combinations
of both
Results: More than 50% of students who performed five
preventive skills (health maintenance for adolescents, young
adults, middle-aged adults, or senior citizens and weight
control counseling) gained that experience only during the
family medicine preceptorship. The majority of students actively
managed six clinical problems (acute strains and sprains,
low back pain, sinusitis, strep throat, acute bronchitis,
and osteoarthritis) uniquely during the family medicine preceptorship.
The preceptorship offered few unique opportunities to perform
procedures.
Conclusions: This family medicine educational experience
was not merely a repeat of what is experienced on the traditional
major rotations. The family medicine preceptorship provided
a setting where students were able to perform several important
ambulatory, primary care skills they had not performed during
their core curriculum of traditional third-year rotations.
Educational Research and
Methods
(Fam Med 1998;30(6):410-6.)
The Problem-based Medical Audit Program: Influence on Family
Practice Residents’ Knowledge and Skills
Gina Ogilvie, MD; Allyn Walsh, MD; Sarah Rice
Background and Objectives:
Family physicians need to possess the skills to conduct audits
in their own clinical settings to ensure that their patients
receive exemplary clinical care. Residency offers an important
opportunity for physicians to develop these auditing skills.
This study describes the introduction of a problem-based medical
audit program at three teaching units in the Department of
Family Medicine at McMaster University and the program’s effect
on learner knowledge, skills, and attitudes toward the practice
audit.
Methods: A survey designed
to assess residents’ self-rated knowledge, skills, and attitudes
toward practice audits was distributed before and after residents
participated in the audit program.
Results: Forty-three residents
were surveyed; 33 (76.7%) completed the initial questionnaire
and follow-up questionnaire. Residents reported significant
improvements in their understanding of the relevance of audits,
ability to develop a practice audit question, skills in designing
methodology, and skills needed to conduct an audit independently.
Residents also reported a moderate increase in their knowledge
of statistics needed to complete an audit.
Conclusions: The
practice audit program at McMaster University uses a problem-based
model to introduce learners to the concept of the clinical
audit. The practice audit program successfully improved the
residents’ self-reported ability to conduct an audit and heightened
their understanding of the importance and relevance of the
audit process.
Educational Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1998;30(6):417-20.)
Teaching Outpatient
Procedures: Most Common Settings, Evaluation Methods, and
Training Barriers in Family Practice Residencies
Victor S. Sierpina, MD; Robert J. Volk,
PhD
Background and Objectives:
The processes of teaching outpatient
procedures in the training of primary care physicians have
not been widely studied or standardized. This study identified
the most widely used teaching settings, methods of evaluation,
and barriers to teaching several key procedures in US family
practice residencies.
Methods: A
survey was sent to directors of family practice residency
programs. Key issues identified in phone survey data of published
experts in procedural training were used in developing the
survey.
Results: Of the 464 residency
directors contacted, 342 (73.7%) returned completed surveys.
Results showed that the family practice center (FPC) was the
most common setting for this teaching. Faculty observation
was used as a principal evaluation method in most programs
for all procedures. Several barriers to training were identified
as “very” or “moderately” important.
Conclusions: While
the FPC is the most frequently used setting for training in
procedures, significant limitations include problems of low
volume, limited methods of evaluation, scheduling difficulties,
and lack of faculty interest and skill. Several internal and
external strategies may be used to alleviate these problems.
Educational Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1998;30(6):421-3.)
Teaching Community-oriented
Primary Care Through Longitudinal Group Projects
J Donsky; T Villela; M Rodriguez; K
Grumbach
Background and Objectives:
Though community-oriented primary care
(COPC) has been advocated as an effective way of addressing
health problems of communities, it is neither widely understood
nor frequently practiced. Because COPC requires an extended
period of time, as well as an approach and skills not generally
learned in medical training, effectively incorporating COPC
training into medical education is difficult and not frequently
attempted. This paper describes a COPC curriculum for family
practice residents based on required participation in a longitudinal
group project.
Methods: Residents
participated in successive groups that completed a COPC project
over a 2-year period. Twenty-two of 26 PGY-2 residents completed
an attitude and knowledge test before and after participation
in the curriculum. A qualitative evaluation of the curriculum
was also performed.
Results: Pretest and posttest
responses showed significant improvement in residents’ knowledge
about COPC and a small but significant decline in attitudes
toward COPC. Residents’ reactions to the curriculum in the
qualitative evaluation were both positive and negative. Residents
enjoyed the group process and found it intellectually stimulating.
Many reported, however, that they did not feel ownership of
the project, that working through the four-step systematic
COPC process was slow and cumbersome, and that they had learned
only part of the COPC process. Residents consistently reported
becoming more aware of the importance of discussing the focus
of the project (ie, childhood discipline or domestic violence)
with their patients and feeling more comfortable initiating
such discussions.
Conclusions: A
COPC curriculum based on required participation in a 2-year
group project promoted completion of substantial projects.
There were trade-offs in resident experience, including loss
of continuity for individual residents. Effectively teaching
COPC and engaging residents in community-oriented activities
remains a challenge.
Educational Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1998;30(6):424-30.)
Residents Find Clinical
Practice Guidelines Valuable as Educational and Clinical Tools
A Helwig; D Bower; M Wolff; C Guse
Background and Objectives:
Information regarding clinical practice
guideline (CPG) use in residency education is limited. We
surveyed a regional population of family practice residents
to determine use, attitudes, and curricular needs for practice
guidelines.
Methods: A written survey was
developed that measured residents’ exposure to, frequency
of use, attitudes, access, and knowledge about use of CPGs.
The survey was mailed to 114 family practice residents.
Results: The response rate
was 75%. The most frequently seen guidelines were immunization
schedules, cancer screening, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension
management. The residents reported positive attitudes toward
CPGs; 75% thought CPGs were easy to use, 80% thought they
improved their efficiency, 78% thought they improved their
residency education, and 75% thought they improved patient
care. Barriers to effective use of practice guidelines were
also identified; 20% knew where to find guidelines in their
clinic, 35% had faculty modeling, and 22% knew how to evaluate
the validity of a guideline. Eighty-nine percent of respondents
desired instruction on CPG use and interpretation.
Conclusions: The
surveyed family practice residents have similar usage rates
for CPGs as the literature reports for practicing physicians,
but residents report more positive attitudes. Barriers that
prevent effective use of CPGs in training environments include
lack of critical appraisal abilities and faculty role modeling.
Educational Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1998;30(6):431-5.)
Care of Persons With
AIDS
in the Nursing Home
John Michael Heath, MD
Background and Objectives:
AIDS is becoming a chronic illness for
some patients whose significant accumulated functional impairments
may limit community-based care. Nursing homes can provide
an appropriate level of care, although reported experience
caring for persons with AIDS in this setting is limited.
Methods: A retrospective case-series
review was conducted in a 242-bed community teaching nursing
home to describe the initial 26-month experience in providing
care for patients with AIDS requiring nursing home admission.
Results: A total of 42 admissions by
32 patients with AIDS (mean age=33.5years, 81% male) involved
a shorter length of stay (mean 63.1 days) and higher numbers
of medications (mean=11.2), facility charges (mean $11,971/admission,
$189/day), and greater clinical management complexity than
usual nursing home patients. Thirteen patients were discharged,
seven for rehospitalization and six into community settings,
although ultimately 29 of the 32 patients died in the facility.
Conclusions: AIDS care in the nursing
home presents significant, distinct challenges in complex
management and terminal care prioritization.
Clinical Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1998;30(6):436-40.)
Improving Diabetes
Preventive Care in a Family Practice Residency Program: A
Case Study in Continuous Quality Improvement
Chester H. Fox, MD; Martin C. Mahoney,
MD, PhD
Background and Objectives:
The paradigm of continuous quality improvement
(CQI) holds promise for application in clinical settings.
This paper highlights results of a CQI project developed and
implemented in a residency-based, ambulatory family medicine
center for management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Methods: We developed
a CQI program that used several indicators of diabetes management
as measures of quality care. These included dietary counseling,
exercise counseling, foot care counseling, ophthalmology referral,
and measurement of hemoglobin AIC and renal function.
Results: Overall,
compliance with recommendations for diabetes management increased
from a baseline proportion of 40% to a level of 70% at the
end of 1 year. During the second year, overall compliance
was maintained at this level despite the inclusion of additional
performance indicators.
Conclusions: The
CQI process can improve physician performance in managing
patients with diabetes.
Clinical Research and Methods
(Fam Med 1998;30(6):441-5.)
The Birth of the
Blended Curriculum
Bruce A. Leibert, MD
Background and Objectives:
In the struggle to survive economically,
our family practice residency program developed a new curriculum
that incorporated elements of both the conventional rotational
model and the newer longitudinal model. We also created unique
elements: immersion weeks, subspecialty clinics, and Tuesday
specials. Immersion weeks provide focused exposures to specialty
areas. The resident brings learned skills back to the family
practice clinic (FPC). Subspecialty clinics in the FPC bring
specialists to the residents and to the residents’ patients
for reinforcement of learned skills. Tuesday specials provide
longitudinal experiences in geriatric, community, and occupational
medicine. The blended curriculum has been a success with both
Residency Assistance Program consultants and the Residency
Review Committee reviewer. It has also increased residents’
availability to see patients in the FPC and increased FPC
income.
Commentary
(Fam Med 1998;30(6):449-51.)
|