STFM Core Curriculum Guidelines
Recommended Core Curriculum Guidelines on Culturally
Sensitive and Competent Health Care
Robert C. Like, MD, MS; R. Prasaad Steiner, MD,
MPH; Arthur J. Rubel, PhD
Editor's Note: To aid
in dissemination of curriculum guidelines created by STFM groups
and task forces, Family Medicine will begin publishing such
guidelines when deemed to be important to the Society's members.
The information that follows are recommendations for helping residency
programs train family physicians to provide culturally sensitive
and competent health care. These guidelines were developed by the
STFM task force and groups listed below and have been endorsed by
the Society's Board of Directors and the American Academy of Family
Physicians. Family Medicine encourages other STFM groups
and task forces to submit similar documents that can serve as curricular
models for residency training and medical education. Groups or task
forces that submit information to the journal should follow the
Instructions for Authors available on
the STFM Web site and published each year in the January issue of
Family Medicine.
(Fam Med 1996;28:291-7.)
Developed by the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine's
Task Force on Cross-cultural Experiences, Group on Multicultural
Health Care and Education, and Group on Minority Health Care.
From the Department of Family Medicine, University
of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical
School, New Brunswick (Dr Like); Department of Family and Community
Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Ky (DR Steiner);
and University of California-Irvine Medical Center, Orange (Dr Rubel).
Background
Family physicians and other health professionals care for individuals
from a wide variety of backgrounds, both in the United States and
abroad. The delivery of high-quality primary health care that is
meaningful, acceptable, accessible, effective, and cost efficient
requires a deeper understanding of the sociocultural background
of patients, their families, and the environments in which they
live. It is also critical to become more aware of how one's own
cultural values, assumptions, and beliefs influence the provision
of clinical care and are shaped by social relationships and the
contexts in which we work and live.
These are the foundation premises for introducing curricular guidelines
for family physicians to promote culturally sensitive and competent
health care. An understanding of sociocultural variables in health
care settings will facilitate the clinical encounter toward more
favorable outcomes and enhance the potential for a more rewarding
interpersonal experience. Further, it is assumed that an examination
of cultural assumptions of health care delivery systems will provide
a better opportunity for quality health care, improved outcomes,
better efficiency, and a more cost-effective system of health services
and medical care.
This document is an ongoing "work in progress" begun 10 years ago
by the STFM Task Force on Cross-cultural Experiences and continued
by members of the STFM Group on Multicultural Health Care and Education
and the STFM Group on Minority Health Care. The task force had identified
the development of curricular guidelines for culturally sensitive
and competent health care as one of its major goals, following the
completion of a national survey of family practice residency programs
by the task force. The survey results indicated that few training
programs provided any formal instruction about culture and health.
The curricular guidelines are designed to introduce topics related
to culture, health, and illness into residency training and graduate
medical education. Family physicians, regardless of their own rearing
or the cultural background of their patients, engage in cross-cultural
clinical encounters in everyday practice. Competency in recognizing
bias, prejudice, and discrimination, using cultural resources, and
overcoming cultural barriers to enhance primary care can be learned.
These curricular guidelines are designed to make that learning more
feasible. The format follows curricular guidelines previously published
by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
Although it is common to think of "culture" in terms of foreign
or exotic situations, these guidelines are intended to prepare family
physicians to provide culturally sensitive and competent primary
care to patients, families, and communities in the United States.
We have attempted to avoid stereotyping groups of people while acknowledging
the presence of common attributes. The task force and working groups
worked to enlarge the view of culture beyond ethic differences to
include socioeconomic, religious, and functional concerns pertinent
to health and health care. The inclusion of culture as a systems
variable in family and community-oriented health care will likely
enrich the clinical practice of medicine by providing a broader
perspective on the experience of disease, illness, and health. Such
a strategy should facilitate a better understanding of various cultural
methods for prevention, curing, healing, and caring.
Our groups are aware of the possibility of perpetuating culturally
biased or culturally bound notions within these guidelines. Cultural
relativism, or relating one's own cultural experiences to those
in another setting, requires knowledge about other cultures, complemented
by self-reflection of one's own (often unexamined) cultural values,
biases, and subjectivity. The members of the task force and groups
worked to become aware of our own medicocentric and ethnocentric
biases during the drafting of this document. Recognition of cultural
biases and methods to transform them in the context of the therapeutic
alliance became one component of these guidelines.
Our focus on culture should not be interpreted to mean that other
key issues such as age, gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation,
social class, or disability are less important for family physicians
and other health care providers to understand in terms of their
critical impact on clinical practice and health care. We also point
out that accepted or preferred descriptive language for describing
human phenomena or processes varies across different academic and
professional disciplines, is likely to change over time, and can
mean different things to different people. The task force and working
groups tried to be sensitive to these issues, considered a wide
variety of terms, encouraged open debate, actively solicited feedback,
and attempted to reach consensus. We urge the readers and users
of this document to be aware of the potential limitations of these
guidelines and to be sensitive to the different meanings that specific
language may have for both professionals and the lay public.
The task force and working groups recognized a need for clinical
relevance and concise, practical guidelines. Themes from anthropology
and ethnomedicine are proposed in a practical framework to better
enable the person-centered and family-oriented goals of family practice.
The training of family physicians who can provide culturally sensitive
and competent health care is one small step toward creating a health
care system that responds to the needs of individuals, families,
and communities in an acceptable, meaningful, and equitable manner.
We anticipate that these curricular guidelines will serve as a reference
point for future revisions and that the evolving curricular models
will benefit all who use them. We also believe that with appropriate
modifications, these guidelines can be used as a model by teachers
and learners in other medical specialties and health professions
disciplines.
Attitudes
Residents will develop attitudes that include:
- Awareness of the impact of sociocultural factors on patients,
practitioners, the clinical encounter, and interpersonal relationships
- Acceptance of the physician's responsibility to understand the
cultural dimensions of health and illness as a core clinical task
in the care of all patients
- Willingness to make their own clinical settings more accessible
to patients by taking into consideration their residential location,
means, and costs of transportation, working hours, language and
communication needs, disability status, and other financial and
environmental circumstances
- Appreciation of the heterogeneity that exists within and across
cultural groups and the need to avoid overgeneralization and negative
stereotyping
- Recognition of their own personal biases and reactions to persons
from different minority, ethnic, and sociocultural backgrounds
and the need to deal with cultural countertransference
- Appreciation of how one's personal cultural values, assumptions,
and beliefs influence the clinical care provided
- Willingness to understand and explicate those values, assumptions,
and beliefs and to examine how they affect the care provided to
patients that share and do not share a similar perspective
- Understanding of the limitations of cultural analysis and the
role played by other historical, political, economic, technologic,
and environmental forces in shaping the delivery of health care
to individuals, families, and communities
- Expressing respect and tolerance for cultural and social class
differences and their value in a pluralistic society
- A moral and ethical obligation to challenge racism, classism,
ageism, sexism, homophobia, and other forms of bias, prejudice,
and discrimination when they occur in health care settings and
society in general
Knowledge
Residents will develop an understanding of:
1. General Sociocultural Issues Relating to Health Care
A. Anthropologic concepts that are essential for the provision
of culturally sensitive and competent health care
B. How all cultural systems-including those of both patients and
physicians-are sources of (congruent and incongruent) beliefs
about health, communication about symptoms, and treatment
C. The impact of culture on the recognition of symptoms and behaviors
related to illness
D. How diversity within a culture affects the provision and utilization
of care
E. How health care systems reflect the prevailing values of the
Cultures) in which they exist
F. Developmental models of ethnosensitivity (eg, fear, denial,
superiority, minimization, relativism, empathy, and integration)
in relation to one's own ethnic and sociocultural background
2. Multiculturalism in the United States
A. Selected minority, ethnic, and sociocultural groups (according
to relevant local needs):
- Northern, Western, Southern, and Eastern European-American
- Black/African-Americans
- Asian/Pacific Island-Americans
- Latino/Hispanic-Americans
- Native Americans/American Indians/Inuit
- West Indian/Caribbean-Americans
- Middle and near Eastern-Americans
B. Selected vulnerable or "at-risk" groups
- Age-specific (infants, children, adolescents, adults, and
older adults)
- Low income
- Homeless persons
- Immigrants/refugees
- Persons in specific occupations
- Migrant workers
- Gays and lesbians
- Persons with developmental disabilities
- Persons with physical disabilities
- Persons with mental disabilities
- Persons with addiction problems
- Persons who are incarcerated
- Other special populations
C. The changing demographics of various population groups
- Historical experiences
- Sociocultural characteristics
- Economic characteristics
- Political characteristics
- Geographic characteristics
- Religious characteristics
- Linguistic characteristics
3. Cultural Perspectives on Medicine and Public Health
A. The health-seeking process and illness behavior
- Sociocultural determinants of health and wellness
- The disease/illness distinction
- Personal/familial health and illness-related beliefs, values,
attitudes, customs, rituals, and behaviors
- Sociocultural risk factors and interventions that can be used
to modify these risk factors
- Kleinman's "typology of health sectors"
a. Use of the "Professional Health Sector" (the organized,
regulated, legally sanctioned health professions, such as
modem Western biomedicine)
b. Use of the "Popular Health Sector (the lay, nonprofessional,
nonspecialist domain of society where ill health is first
recognized and defined, and health care activities are initiated)
c. Use of the "Folk Health Sector (nonprofessional, nonbureaucratic
forms of healing that are either sacred, secular, or both)
d. Interactions within and across the professional, popular,
and folk sectors of care
e. Outcomes of professional, popular, and folk healing
126. Access issues and barriers/facilitators
to care
B. Cultural assumptions and their influence on the US health
care system
- Basic value orientations (in relation to human nature, other
people, activity, time, and the environment)
- Self-help/volunteerism/consumerism
- Advocacy/activism
- Populism/elitism
- Separatism/pluralism/integration
- Opportunity/optimism
- Efficacy/effectiveness/equity
- Prejudice/discrimination (eg, racism, classism, ageism, sexism,
homophobia)
- Privilege/disadvantage
- Power/powerlessness/critical consciousness
4. The Ethnosensitive (Cultural) Epidemiology of Health and Illness
Problems of Diverse Population Groups
A. Clinical problems relating to the nation's health promotion
and disease prevention objectives
B. Clinical problems having high mortality and morbidity rates
C. Clinical problems relating to the stage of the individual and
family life cycles and major life events (pregnancy, birth, marriage,
death, etc)
D. Clinical problems that are linked to culture shock from migration,
intergenerational value orientation conflicts, and acculturation/assimilation
processes
E. Clinical problems relating to "folk illnesses" (eg, "high blood,"
"falling out," "evil eye," "susto," "ghost sickness," "koro")
F. Clinical problems present in country or geographic area of
origin
Skills
Residents will develop skills in the following areas:
1. Clinical Practice
A. Forming and maintaining a therapeutic alliance
B. Recognizing and appropriately responding to verbal and nonverbal
communication
C. Constructing a medical and psychosocial history and performing
a physical examination in a culturally sensitive fashion
D. Using the biopsychosocial model in disease prevention/health
promotion, the interpretation of clinical signs and symptoms,
and illness-related problem solving
E. Prescribing treatment in a culturally sensitive manner
F. Using the negotiated approach to clinical care
- Berlin and Fowke's LEARN model
(L)-Listening to the patient's perspective
(E)-Explaining and sharing one's own perspective
(A)-Acknowledging differences and similarities between these
two perspectives
(R)-Recommending a treatment plan
(N)-Negotiating a mutually agreed-on treatment plan
- Explanatory model (EM) elicitation techniques Eliciting individual
or family EMs: (ie, "ideas about the etiology, onset, pathophysiology,
prognosis, and treatment of disease and illness")
- Illness prototype (IP) and patient request (PR) elicitation
techniques Eliciting individual or family: (ie, "ideas about
sickness based on previous personal experiences, the experiences
of significant others, or media-transmitted information") Eliciting
individual or family PRs: ie, "the type of help [clinical resource]
the patient would like [hopes, wishes, wants] to receive from
the practitioner")
- Pfifferling's cultural status exam
- Stuart and Lieberman's BATHE model (Background/Affect/Trouble/Handling/Empathy)
Exploring the psychosocial context of the patient's visit to
provide social support and as a basis for gaining insight
G. Using family members, community gatekeepers, translators/interpreters,
and other community resources and advocacy groups
H. Working collaboratively with other health care professionals
in a culturally sensitive and competent manner
I. Working with alternative/complementary medicine practitioners
and/or indigenous, lay, or folk healers when professionally, ethically,
and legally appropriate
J. Identifying how one's cultural values, assumptions, and beliefs
affect patient care and clinical decision making
2. Administrative Practice
A. Analyzing the sociocultural dimensions of one's own practice
site and the implications for practice management
B. Implementing a cultural sensitization training program for
office/clinic staff
C. Promoting cultural competence in health care organizations
as part of total quality management and continuous quality improvement
activities
D. Using ethnographic and epidemiological techniques in developing
a community-oriented family practice
E. Influencing the cultures of health care organizations and professional
groups (eg, managed care organizations, ambulatory care facilities,
hospitals, nursing homes, specialty societies)
Implementation
The implementation of this core curriculum should be longitudinal.
For family practice residency training programs, the learning experiences
should be offered throughout the 3 years of residency training.
For medical students, positioning portions of the curricula into
required courses and into electives should extend over the preclinical
and clinical years.
Culturally sensitive and competent health care should be integrated
into existing educational clinical activities, including hospital
attending rounds, morning report, grand rounds, lecture series,
clinical case conferences, morbidity and mortality rounds, small
group seminars, Balint groups, precepting, videotape reviews, journal
club, home visits, community fieldwork experiences, and self-learning.
Block elective experiences are also desirable, which involve work
with specific minority, ethnic, or cultural groups, folk or lay
medical practitioners, or placements in cross-cultural/international
settings.
Residency faculty should function as role models by conducting
their personal and professional affairs to reinforce the concept
of culturally responsive health care. Ongoing faculty development
activities are strongly recommended to deal with potential areas
of discomfort and resistance and to identify attitudes, knowledge,
and skills that need to be further improved or strengthened. Locally
available behavioral and social scientists who have expertise in
clinically applied anthropology should be identified, and interdisciplinary
collaborative work with them is highly recommended. Linkages should
also be sought with formal and informal community leaders, advocacy
groups, culture brokers, and appropriate alternative/complementary
medicine practitioners and/or indigenous healers. Specific intercultural
training strategies include: cognitive training, behavior modification,
experiential learning, cultural self-awareness, and attribution
training. Relevant bibliographic, games/simulations, and audiovisual
materials should be available in the residency library (see attached
listing for some selected examples). Implementation strategies will
likely vary across residency programs and should be individualized
to cover issues relating to the sociocultural groups in need of
and receiving health care in local communities. Faculty and resident
interests, existing resources, and available curricular time will
also be important determinants of the planned intercultural training
activities.
Systematic quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the impact
of these educational programs need to be carefully designed and
carried out and the results shared with interested audiences. In
particular, it will be important to learn from how various people
have implemented the guidelines and the programmatic challenges
experienced from both successful and unsuccessful efforts. We would
propose that after a specified period of time (eg, 5 years), STFM
should gather feedback and conduct a review of these guide lines
and related educational activities. This could be done through a
cooperative effort involving interested groups, task forces, and
other networks existing in STFM.
Recommended Cross-cultural Health Care
Resources
1. Adams DL, ed. Health issues for women of color: a cultural diversity
perspective. Thousand Oaks, Calif. Sage Publications, 1995.
2. Airhihenbuwa CO. Health and culture: beyond the western paradigm.
Thousand Oaks, Calif. Sage Publications, 1995.
3. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical
manual of mental disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV). Washington,
DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994:943-9-.55-7.
4. Bailey EJ. Urban African-American health care. Lanham, Md: University
Press of America, 1991.
5. Berlin EA, Fowkes WC Jr. A teaching framework for cross-cultural
health care. West J Med 1983; 1 39:934-8.
6. Blackball LJ, Murphy ST, Frank G, Michel V, Azen S. Ethnicity
and attitudes toward patient autonomy. JAMA 1995;274:820-5.
7. Borkan JM, Neher JO. A developmental model of ethnosensitivity
in family practice training. Fam.Med 1991;23:212-7.
8. Braithwaite RL, Taylor SE, eds. Health issues in the black community.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1992.
9. Brooks TR. Pitfalls in communication with Hispanic and African-American
patients: do translators help. or harm? JAMA 1992;84:941-7.
10. Carole CE, ed. Training manual in medical anthropology. Special
publication no. 18. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association
and the Society for Applied Anthropology, 1985.
11. Chrisman NJ, Maretzki TW, eds. Clinically applied anthropology:
anthropologists in health science settings. Dordrecht, Holland:
D. Reidel, 1982.
12. Cole-Kelly K. Cultures engaging cultures: international medical
graduates training in the United States. Fam Med 1994;26:6 1 8-
24.
13. Comaz-Diaz L, Griffith EEH, eds. Clinical Guidelines in cross-cultural
mental health New York: Wiley & Sons, 1988.
14. Comaz-Diaz L. Delivering preventive health care to Hispanics:
a manual for providers. Washington, DC: The National Coalition of
Hispanic Health and Human Services Organizations. 1990.
15. Coreil J, Mull JK, eds. Anthropology and primary health care.
Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1990.
16. Cross-cultural medicine (special issue). West J Med 1983; 139.
17. Cross-cultural medicine a decade later (special issue). West
J Med 1992; 157.
18. Davis BJ. Voegtle KH. Culturally competent health care for adolescents:
a guide for primary care providers. Chicago: American Medical Association,
1994.
19. Desjarlais R. World mental health: problems and priorities in
low-income countries. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
20. Eisenberg L. Kleinman A, eds. The relevance of social science
for medicine. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, 1981.
21. Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Foster C, Norlock FE, Calkins DR,
Delbanco TL. Unconventional medicine in the United States: prevalence,
costs, and patterns of use. New Engl J Med 1993;328:246-52.
22. Falicov CJ, ed. Cultural perspectives in family therapy. Rockville,
Md: Aspen Systems Corporation, 1983.
23. Foster GM, Anderson BG. Medical anthropology. New York: John
Wiley & Sons' 1978. 24. Freire P: Pedagogy of the oppressed. New
York: Herder and Herder, 197 1.
25. Freire P: Education for critical consciousness. New York: Seabury,
1973.
26. Freire P, Shor 1. A pedagogy for liberation. London: MacMillan,
1987.
27. Galanti G-A. Caring for patients from different cultures: case
studies from American hospitals. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania
Press, 1991.
28. Galazka SS, Eckert X. Clinically applied anthropology: concepts
for the family physician. J Farn Pract 1987;22:159-65.
29. Gardenswartz L, Rowe A. Managing diversity: a complete desk
reference and planning guide. Burr Ridge, III; New York; San Diego:
Business One Irwin/Pfeiffer & Company, 1993.
30. Gaw A, ed. Culture, ethnicity, and mental illness. Washington,
DC: American Psychiatric Press, 199 1.
31. Geissler EM. Pocket guide to cultural assessment. St Louis:
Mosby-Year Book, Inc, 1994. 32. Ginsberg C. Interpretation and translation
services in health care: a survey of US public and private teaching
hospitals. A national public health and hospital institute report.
Washington, DC: March 1995.
33. Gonzales VM. Health promotion for diverse cultural communities.
Palo Alto, Calif: Stanford Health Promotion Resource Center (Stanford
Center for Research and Disease Prevention), 1991.
34. Gonzalez CA, et al. Cross-cultural issues in psychiatric treatment.
In: Gabbard GO, ed. Treatment of psychiatric disorders, second edition.
Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1993.
35. Hacker A. Two nations: black and white, separate, hostile, unequal.
New York: Ballantine Books, 1995.
36. Hahn RA. Sickness and healing: an anthropological perspective.
New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press, 1995.
37. Hahn RA, Gaines AD, eds. Physicians of western medicine: anthropological
approaches to theory and practice. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel,
1985.
38. Harwood A, ed. Ethnicity and medical care. Cambridge, Mass:
Harvard University Press, 1981.
39. Helman CG: Culture, health, and illness, fourth edition. New
York, NY: Arnold Publishers, 2001
40. Helman CG.Tbe family culture: a useful concept for family practice.
Fam Med 1991;23:376-81.
41. Ho MK. Family therapy with ethnic minorities. Newbury Park,
Calif: Sage Publications, 1987.
42. Irish KP, Lundquist KF, Nelsen VJ, eds. Ethnic variations in
dying, death. and grief. diversity in universality. Washington,
DC: Taylor & Francis, 1993.
43. Isaac MR, Benjamin MR Toward a culturally competent system of
care: programs that utilize culturally competent principles. Washington,
DC: CASSP Technical Assistance Center, 1991.
44. Katon W, Kleinman A. Doctor-patient negotiation and other social
science strategies in patient care. In: Eisenberg L. Kleinman A.
The relevance of social science for medicine. Dordrecht, Holland:
D. Reidel, 1981;253-82.
45. Kavanagh KH, Kennedy P. Promoting cultural diversity: strategies
for health care professionals. Thousand Oaks, Calif. Sage Publications,
1992.
46. Kleinman A. Patients and healers in the context of culture.
Berkeley, Calif. University of California Press, 1990.
47. Kleinman A. The illness narratives: suffering, healing, and
the human condition. New York: Basic Books, 1988.
48. Kleinman A, Eisenberg L, Good B. Culture, illness, and care.
Clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research.
Ann Intem Med 1978;88:251-8.
49. Kreps GL, Kunimoto EN. Effective communication in multicultural
health care settings. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 1994.
50. Lassiter SM. Multicultural clients: a professional handbook
for health care providers and social workers. Westport, Conn: Greenwood
Press, 1995.
51. Lee CC, Richardson BL, eds. Multicultural issues in counseling:
new approaches to diversity. Alexandria, Va: American Counseling
Association, 1991.
52. Like RC. Culturally sensitive health care: recommendations for
family practice training. Fain Med 199 1;23:180- 1.
53. Like RC, Steiner RR Medical anthropology and the family physician.
Fain Med 1986-,18:87-92.
54. Lynch EW, Hanson MJ, eds. Developing cross-cultural competence:
a guide for working with young children and their families. Baltimore:
Paul H. Brookes, 1992.
55. Mauksch LB, Roesler T Expanding the context of the patient's
explanatory model using circular questioning. Family Systems Medicine
1990;8:3-13.
56. McGoldrick M, Pearce JK, Giordano J, eds. Ethnicity and family
therapy. New York: Guilford Press, 1982.
57. Molina CW, Aguirre-Molina M. Latino health in the US: a growing
challenge. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 1995.
58. Office of Minority Health Resource Center. Pocket guide to minority
health resources. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human
Services, Public Health Service, 1995. 59. O'Hare W. America's minorities
the demographics of diversity. Washington, DC: Population Reference
Bureau, December 1992.
60. Orr RD, Marshall PA, Osborn J. Cross-cultural considerations
in clinical ethics consultations. Arch Fain Med 1995;4:159- 64.
61. Pachter LM. Culture and clinical care: folk illness beliefs
and behaviors and their im- plications for health care delivery.
JAMA 1994; 271:690-4.
62. Paul B, ed. Health, culture, and community. New York: Russell
Sage Foundation, 1955.
63. Payer L. Medicine and culture. New York: Penguin, 1988.
64. Pfifferling JH. A cultural prescription for medicocentrism.
In: Eisenberg L, Kleinman A, eds. The relevance of social science
for medicine. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, 1981:207.
65. Pinderhughes EB. Understanding ethnicity, race, and power: the
key to efficacy in clinical practice. New York: The Free Press,
1989.
66. Qureshi B. Transcultural medicine: dealing with patients from
different cultures, second edition. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic
Publishers, 1994.
67. Randall-Davis E. Strategies for working with culturally diverse
communities and clients. Bethesda, Md: The Association for the Care
of Children's Health, 1989.
69. Rubel AJ, O'Nell CW, Ardon RC. Susto: a folk illness. Berkeley,
Calif. University of California Press, 1984. Saba GW, Karrer BM,
Hardy KV, eds. Minorities and family therapy. New York: The Haworth
Press, 1989.
70. Shimkin DB, Golde P, eds. Clinical anthropology: a new approach
to American health problems? Lanham, Md: University Press of America,
1983.
71. Simons RC, Hughes CC. eds. The culture-bound syndromes: folk
illnesses of psychiatric and anthropologic interest. Dordrecht.
Holland: D. Reidel, 1985.
72. Snow LF. Traditional health beliefs and practices among lower
class biack Americans. West J Med 1983:139:820-8.
73. Snow LF. Walkin' over medicine. Boulder. Colo: Westview Press,
1993.
74. Spector R. Cultural diversity in health and illness, third edition.
Norwalk. Conn: Appleton & Lange. 1991.
75. Spiegel JP. Cultural aspects of transference and countertransference
revisited. J Am Acad Psychoanal 1976;4:437-67.
76. Stanfeld JH, Dennis RM. eds. Race and ethnicity in research
methods. Newbury Park. Califi. Sage Publications, 1993.
77. Stein 11F. The psychoayriamics of medical practice: unconscious
factors in patient care. Berkeley, Calif. and Los Angeles: University
of California Press, 1985.
78. Stein HF. American medicine as culture. Boulder, Colo: Westview
Press. 1990.
79. Stein HF. Listening deeply: an approach to under-standing and
consulting in organizational culture. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press,
1994.
80. Sue DW, Sue D. Counseling the culturally different: theory and
practice, second edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 1990.
81. Stuart MR, Lieberman JA Ill. The 15- minute hour applied psychotherapy
for the primary cam physician. second edition. Westport, Conn: Praeger,
1993.
82. Thomas A, Sillen S. Racism and psychiatry. Secaucus, NJ: The
Citadel Press, 1979.
83. Todd 1-1F Jr, Ruffini JL , eds. Teaching medical anthropology:
model courses for graduate and undergraduate instruction. Special
publication no. 1. Washington, DC: Society for Medical Anthropology,
1979.
84. Waxler-Morrison N, ed. Cross-cultural caring: a handbook for
health professionals. Vancouver, BC, Canada: University of British
Columbia Press, 1990.
85. Weiler K. Freire and a feminist pedagogy of difference. Harvard
Educational Review 1991;61(4):449-74.
86. Westermeyer J. Psychiatric care of migrants: a clinical guide.
Washington, DC: Atnerican Psychiatric Press, 1989.
87. Woloshin S. Language barriers in medicine in the United States.
JAMA 1995;273:724-8.
88. Young TK. The health of Native Americans; toward a biocultural
epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press. 1994.
89. Zane NWS. Takeuchi DT, Young KNJ, eds. Confronting critical
health issues of Asian and Pacific Islander Americans. Newbury Park,
Calif, Sage Publications, 1994.
Experiential Exercises/Games/Simulations/Videos
1. BaFa' BaFa.' Simulation Training Systems, 218 Twelfth Street,
Del Mar, CA 92014-0901.
2. Brislin RW, Yoshida T. Improving intercultural interactions:
modules for cross-cultural training programs. Thousand Oaks. Calif
Sage Publications, 1993.
3. Brislin R, Yoshida T. Intercultural communication training: an
introduction. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 1994.
4. Committee on Minority Health Affairs. Racial and cultural bias
in medicine: video and discussion guide. Kansas City, Mo: American
Academy ofFamily Physicians, July 1991.
5. Keys MM. Frank DG. Grocery store: a role-play simulation. Edited
by Moorhead Kennedy Institute and published for the YMCA of Greater
New York. Yarmouth, Me: Intercultural Press, 1993.
6. Monroe A, Goldman R. Dube C. Race, culture, and ethnicity: assessing
alcohol and other drug problems. In: Dube C. LewisD.eds.ProjectADEPT
(Volume5). Providence, RI: Brown University Center for Alcohol and
Addiction Studies, 1994.
7. Oomkes FR. Thomas RH. Developing cross-cultural communication.
Aldershot, Hants, UK: Connaught Training Limited, 1992.
8. Nipporica Associates and Hofner D. Ecotonos: a multicultural
problem-solving simulation. Yarmouth, Me: Intercultural Press. 1993.
9. Pope-Davis DB. Multicultural counseling: issues ofethnic diversity.
AVC Marketing, University oflowa. C215 SSH, Iowa City. IA 52242.
10. Rowel Education Association. The welfare simulation. 5300 Delmar,
St. Louis, MO.
11. Thiagarajan S, Steinwachs B. Bamga: A simulation game on cultural
clashes. Yarmouth, Me: Intercultural Press, 1990.
12. Weeks WH, Pedersen PB, Brislin RW, eds. A manual of structured
experiences for cross-cultural teaming. Yarmouth. Me: Intercultural
Press. 1979.
Acknowledgments:
We would like to thank past and current members of the STFM Task
Force on Cross-cultural Experiences, the STFM Group on Multicultural
Health Care and Education, the STFM Group on Minority Health Care,
and the STFM Board of Directors for their insightful reviews and
constructive feedback related to earlier versions of these guidelines.
Extremely helpful suggestions for improving the guidelines were
also received from colleagues in the Society for Medical Anthropology
and other behavioral and social scientists interested in the education
of primary health care professionals. We invite further ongoing
dialogue, comments, and critique of this "living document."
Corresponding Author:
Address correspondence to Dr Like, University of Medicine & Dentistry
of New lemey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Family
Medicine, One Robert Wood Johnson Place. CN 19, New Brunswick, NJ
08903-0019.
List of Contributors
In alphabetical order
Jeffrey Borkan, MD, PhD
University of Massachusetts and Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.
Israel
Kathleen Culhane-Pera.MD-MIA
St Paul-Ramsey Medical Ctr.. St Paul, Minn
Celestine M. Fulchon. PhD
Monteflore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
Roberta E. Goldman, PhD
Brown University
Cynthia Haq, MD
University of Wisconsin
Cecil G. Helman, MD
University College London, England
Thomas M. Johnson, PhD
University of Alabama, Huntsville
Martin L. Kabongo, MD, PhD
Sharp Family Practice Residency Program La Mesa, Calif
Robert C. Like, MD, MS
UMDNI-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
Ramoncita R. Maestas, MD
Providence FP Residency Program, Seattle
Arthur J. Rubel. PhD
University of California, Irvine
George W. Saba, PhD
University of California, San Francisco
Linda M. Sinapi, MSW, CISW
University of Connecticut
Howard F. Stein, PhD
University of Oklahoma
R. Prasaad Steiner, MD, MPH
University of Louisville
Laura A. Williams, MD
UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
|