Advertising and
Partnership Policies: Approved the following two recommendations from the
Communications Committee for a 1-year trial:
This action resulted from the
STFM Executive Committee’s discussion of recent concerns about the
American Board of Physician Specialties flyers that were mailed with the
September issue of Family Medicine. The issue has numerous nuances, and
while the committee appreciated the concerns of a number of members,
several Board members found that the response from Mark Loafman, MD, MPH,
assistant professor family medicine from Northwestern Feinberg School
of Medicine, and chair of the Board of Certification in Family Medicine
Obstetrics from the ABPS, justified our sharing the flyers with members.
The issue was not fully resolved, and a smaller subset of the STFM Board
is going to continue the dialogue and determine if future partnerships
with certifying groups other than ABFM is appropriate for STFM.
Approved
2012 STFM Budget: Approved the STFM 2012 budget as presented to
the Board with total projected income at $3,183,876 and projected
expenses at $3,183,868.
Advocacy Decision Tree: Approved an
Advocacy Decision Tree to help make decisions on which issues STFM will
develop statements for and which it will not.
Advocacy Policy
Manual: Approved numerous changes to the Advocacy Policy manual, which
will be posted to the STFM Web site once approved by the other Academic
Family Medicine Advocacy Committee associations (American Academy
of Family Physicians, Association of Family Medicine Residency Directors,
Association of Departments of Family Medicine, North American Primary
Care Research Group, STFM).
Approval of Policy on Investments:
Approved a revised STFM investment policy document.STFM has been working
since July with our investment manager to make STFM investment policies
reflect the current environment.
Strategic
Plan: Discussed and revised elements of the 2012-2014 STFM Strategic
Plan to make itmore concise and realistic to accomplish in the next 3
years. View the Strategic Plan
Third Quarter Financial
Statement: Reviewed the third quarter statement. STFM continues to enjoy
being in solid financial position. Strong performance from
membership,advertising income, conferences, and special projects has
contributed to our performance this year.
Communications Audit:
Discussed the findings of an STFM communications audit led by STFM
communications staff in response to comments on needed improvements in
communications from the member needs survey. As a result of the audit
findings, a series of actions will betaken to make our communications
more consistent overall and more effective,including an updated Web site
and improvements to the Messenger and Resource Library. The Board
discussed and approved a specific recommendation to create a new logo and
tagline for STFM to better reflect STFM’s efforts to be an innovative
and progressive organization. The Board noted that it will be important
for the Society to engage the membership early in the process of creating
the new logo and for us to explain the reasoning behind the change. Be
watching your e-mails and the Messenger over the next few months
for opportunities to provide input on the design.
Program Assessment
Special Committee Update: Reviewed activities of a newly created
special committee charged with creating a process for evaluating current
STFM initiatives and as well as initiating these reviews. Over the next
few months, the committee will continue to gather data to evaluate STFM
programs. Part of the culture change the special committee will recommend
is the development of an evaluation cycle for programs/initiatives when
they are being develop so this evaluation becomes part of the continuous
quality improvement of initiatives.
Strategic Plan Measures Task
Force: Reviewed the first draft of a matrix that begins to define goals,
objectives, and measures for each STFM program and initiative. The Board
agreed that it’s important to work with individuals who created the
programs and also have an external group evaluate the process for
consistency with other initiatives’ measures. As a first step toward this
collaborative process, by the end of November, initiative leaders will
be asked to send to staff any objectives and measures they have created
for their initiatives. The task force will review these and will also
suggest goals and measures for those initiatives where these are missing.
Updates from the Program Committee: Strong submissions and
intentional programming to fill any important content gaps are
anticipated to result in an exciting 2012 Annual Spring Conference.
Activities of note for the 2012 annual meeting are:
Preceptor Resources
Site Update: Reviewed information on the new preceptor resources Web
site, to be called “Teaching Physician”that will go live in January
2012. Mary Theobald from staff is looking for members to contribute
content to the site. This resource will need to look for opportunities to
link with the work and resources of the Resident Competency Measurement
Task Force and the Resident Faculty Development Training Modules.
Annals
of Family Medicine: Discussed current issues and activities related to
the Annals of Family Medicine. The journal continues to be an important resource for the
discipline and perceived as a high quality publishing venue.
HRSA Tri-Board
Meeting: Discussed a HRSA project that will support a meeting of
representatives from family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics
to discuss a faculty development effort across the disciplines. The
outcome of this January 2012 meeting will be to develop a plan for what
this effort should look like. Members from our Resident Competency
Measurement Task Force have been invited to participate.
Length of
Residency Training Pilot: Discussed the American Board of Family
Medicine collaboration with the ACGME RC-FM on a length of residency
training pilot. STFM leadership and Council of Academic Family Medicine
representatives will encourage pilot organizers to create a well-designed
research pilot that looks at models beyond the 4-year concept, eg, a
2-year model and a model that integrates residency training in the 4th
year of medical school.
CFPC Collaboration: President-elect
Jerry Kruse, MD, shared several learnings from his participation in the
College of Family Physicians of Canada Board of Directors meeting in
Montreal. He and Stacy Brungardt, CAE, also attended their preconference
session with their Section of Teachers and their Board dinner. Mike
Donoff, MD, from the University of Alberta, has been an integral part of
the Resident Competency Measurement Task Force, sharing his expertise and
experiences from the local and national level on competency measurement.
Ivy Oandasan, CFPC Consulting Director for Academic Family Medicine,
presented multiple sessions at our 2011 annual meeting on competency
education and interprofessional education. STFM will continue to look for
opportunities to create linkages with our Canadian colleagues and share
these opportunities with our membership.
PAEA White
Paper: Immediate Past President Perry Dickinson, MD, reported on progress
of the small team from STFM and the Physician Assistant Education
Association that is developing a white paper about educational issues
related to physician assistants and family medicine educators working
together on interprofessional education.
Non-physician Label: The
Board gave the Membership Committee the charge of identifying a better
membership label for “non-physician”.For years we have struggled with
identifying a better way to identify our members who are not physicians.
Our President Jeri Hepworth, PhD, suggested “other health professionals”
for the committee to consider. What do you think? Let Sally Weaver and
the Membership Committee hear your ideas.